SPX and NYA: What

So here's something I don't get to say very often:  The "passable impulse down" I mentioned last update was a bust, and SPX cleared the noted invalidation level (3965).

Price is still hugging the near-term channel I drew on March 17 -- for now, anyway, but bears probably need that to be a diagonal (approximated by the red and blue lines below) so it doesn't threaten a breakout.  If it does break out, it may head toward the confluence shown on the third chart.

Nothing like a near-term miss to get one thinking, so the NYA chart does mention the bull option (in passing -- for now, I'm not focusing on it):

SPX is in similar shoes to NYA.  In a perfect world for bears, though, SPX stops at or before the highlighted confluence:

In conclusion, we do have five clear waves down (an impulse) in NYA, which means that unless that impulse is wave C of the noted expanded flat, it will be followed by another impulse down that is equal to or greater in length than the first.  We cannot entirely rule out all bull options, but if this is the start of blue 3, that next impulse down will be a nested third wave and thus fairly brutal.  Today is, of course, a Fed day, so watch your back out there, and trade safe.

SPX and Gold Updates

Last update called attention to the fact that SPX had reached the upper boundary of its near-term red channel and mentioned that we might have three waves up off the 3808 low.  SPX dropped lower from there, and has now formed a passable impulse down, potentially for all or part of wave i down.  The key level for bears to hold for that potential first wave down to remain on the table is 3965.

Big picture, nothing has changed, and blue (3) remains the leader unless/until the market tells us otherwise.

Finally, a quick update of the gold chart, which we haven't looked at in quite some time.  Gold has formed three waves down (the inverse implication of the near-term SPX chart -- three waves can mark a completed countertrend correction):

In conclusion, not much to add to the past few updates, except a reminder that if blue (3) is indeed underway, this market should start to get ugly over the next few weeks.  Trade safe.

SPX Update

Since last update, the rumor began to float that several large banks (including JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, Morgan Freeman, Morgan Morgan & Morgan, and The Bank Without a Morgan) might team up and, just when they were needed the most, prop up the Federal Reserve.  This led to a significant bounce, and SPX rallied 100 points on the thought that maybe we wouldn't have to listen to Powell say "tools" ever again.

Of course, the bad news is that there suddenly seem to be a lot of banks that need propping up, but let's not talk about... hey look, a squirrel!

Chart-wise, the near-term suggests we might have three waves up off the 3808 low, but it could support one more wave beyond yesterday's high and remain a three.  It might be easier to watch the red channel than to try to nail down the exact near-term count.  If the current rally is a simple C-wave up from 3838, then it already tagged the upper red boundary, but is also allowed to overthrow it a bit if it wants.

Big picture, not much to add to the past few updates.  Red 2 is not invalidated yet, so we can't entirely ignore it as an option, and it stays on the chart for now -- but recall, as I wrote previously, that we are presuming blue 3 is underway unless and until the market tells us otherwise.

In conclusion, not much else to add to the past few updates.  Trade safe.

SPX, BKX, NYA Updates

Since last update, SPX captured its 3820-45 target (from March 8), exceeded it by about 10 points, then bounced.  That's potentially 3 waves up off the 3808 low (to 3937), so bears can take it back below 3808 from here if they want.  

Given where we are in the big picture, this is market is very possibly hanging by a thread, so countertrend trading (i.e.- bullish trades) should be kept on a very tight leash unless and until there are more bull signals.  The most bearish case is that we've already entered Blue 3 -- and frankly, there's nothing currently in the charts to suggest otherwise.  That can, of course, always change tomorrow, but this is what's in front of us right now.

Probably the front-runner for the "bull" options (not long-term bullish) would be the expanded flat discussed on March 1:

One can at least envision a world where the Fed announces at its upcoming meeting it's going to pause rate hikes and the market gets excited, leading to the option above. 

NYA has continued to track SPX:

And finally, we haven't update BKX in a while, but it has confirmed my long-term bearish outlook and finally officially captured its 90 target from way back on May 1, 2022 (bottommost annotation).  Also, I'm getting flashbacks to the 2008 bear, where BKX often led the way down:

In conclusion, we can come up with a scenario where BKX completes the blue 5 potential and SPX runs the expanded flat (2nd chart), but those are best-case bull scenarios, and the worst-case bear scenario is a third wave waterfall lower that erases 1400-1500 points from SPX's current levels.  In both cases, the long-term outlook remains bearish, as it has for over a year now.  Trade safe.

(Incidentally, I published another piece earlier this morning:  Why? Because It's Really Important)

Why? Because It's Really Important

(Note: SPX will be covered in the next update, later today.)

Before I start, I'd like to clarify something about Monday's update:  When I said that SVB's collapse can be laid at the feet of the Fed, I didn't mean to imply (by omission) that SVB management is entirely blameless.  Of course SVB's missteps also played a role.  I felt that was self-evident, so my point was that when the Fed fills a room with gasoline, you don't solely blame the guy who struck the match when the whole place goes up in flames.

You blame them both.  Because both parties acted irresponsibly.  And, in this case (and most cases that are still to come) you can't have one party blow up without the other party setting the stage.

Before we forget... the stage, as set by our leaders, was:

• The Fed kept rates too low for too long, which created numerous asset bubbles
• The Fed pumped $8 trillion of QE into the market, which created numerous asset bubbles
• The Fed and Federal Government flooded the economy with stimulus, thereby diluting the value of existing dollars and contributing to inflation
• Both the Fed and the government failed to even foresee the looming inflation (remember "it's just transitory"?)
• They failed to foresee it because they operate from a flawed philosophy (Keynesianism)
• They then had to abruptly stop the free money party and reverse course.

Five years ago, I warned about all this.  Warned that the Fed was distorting the market and sending false signals to the economy, which would naturally drive businesses into unsustainable excesses (often through no fault of their own), which in turn meant that when the Fed finally stopped, collapses would be inevitable.  Five years ago, I argued that.  As I wrote then:

And through all that, we've learned this: The problems never seem to come while the Fed is running the pumps; the problems come afterwards. Everything booms when the cheap money is flowing -- but this "false boom" is, in fact, exactly what plants the seeds for the future bust. It seems to be an endless cycle of the current Keynesian economic policies.

So no, it wasn't "deregulation" (as some are now claiming) that set the stage -- otherwise, how could I have seen it coming before that deregulation even happened?  The stage is much more complex than that.  In fact, the complexity of the environment is exactly what makes simplistic one-word narratives ("deregulation!" etc.) so appealing for our leaders to deploy against a population that doesn't have the time to dig deeper.

For Monday's piece, I chose to focus on the role of the Fed/gov't instead of SVB because (in theory, anyway) we're supposed to be able to course-correct our own government.  (Though many of us feel this is an increasingly futile effort.)

I wanted to clarify that -- but please bear with me a moment longer, because I believe this is important.

Last update predicted:

So ultimately, [SVB] is yet another collapse that can be laid at the doorstep of the core Keynesian philosophy (top-down central "management" of the economy) that has long captivated and motivated the leaders of our institutions. As the trouble snowballs, you'd better believe they will not want to take the blame for any of it -- so the history-rewrites and propaganda will start any minute, if they haven't already.

That prediction has, unfortunately, since come to pass.  Because luckily for America, the Fed and the government have never ever made mistakes or mismanaged the economy, and thus not one single problem has ever been their fault.  Quite the opposite, as it turns out!  The fault, we're always told, is actually that those entities were given too little control.

Kind of a win-win for the powers that be, when you think about it.  Even when they monumentally screw things up, they simply point the finger elsewhere and claim it's because what they really needed was even more power to screw things up.

You may be under the impression that I'm beating a dead horse here -- I am not.  I was around before, during, and after the 2008 crash.  In 2008, I diagnosed the problems before the crash happened (as did many others), then carefully observed those problems catastrophically unwind in real-time... and then watched the Fed and our government tap-dance right out of taking any significant blame for the bubbles and problems they themselves created.

And this is exactly why we're doing it all over again.  

Because no real accountability ever occurred, since most of the public remained blissfully unaware, and hence no lessons were ever learned, and no core changes were ever made.  And that was only possible because the general public was effectively duped into believing it was 100% the fault of everyone BUT the Fed/gov't.  So, when the 2008 crash was all over, we passed banking laws that addressed the symptoms but completely ignored the disease.

I'm going to try to do my part to help keep people from falling for it again this time around.  If we want to have any hope of rebuilding on solid ground, then we'd damn well better learn the real, and painful, lessons this time.  Not the false "lessons" they spoon-feed us.

Speaking of, let's quickly glance at a few "charts," to see how Monday's prediction of "immediate blame-shifting propaganda incoming" fared:

And that's just a smattering of the propaganda that's been rolled out since I published on Monday.  I could have posted a dozen more.  

So why did I say this was "important"?

Well, given that we seem to be going down this road for the second time in only 15 years, as I see it: We cannot afford to fall for the false narratives again, or this path will be repeated forever.  

Of course, that's assuming we even make it back this time.  And I'm not 100% certain we will.

Trade safe.

SPX and NYA Updates

Lots happened last week, most notably, the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), which is the second largest U.S. bank collapse in history, second only to Washington Mutual in 2008.  Silvergate and Signature Bank have also both gone the way of the Dodo.

Not quite a year ago (May 2022), I penned a piece titled "Not Even the End of the Beginning," in which I discussed the Fed's intentions as I was interpreting them at the time, and wrote:

My personal theory is that the Fed won't bail out the market until it's too late and too much damage has already been done. I base this speculation largely on the charts, but even if I had no charts, I would probably speculate the same thing, because the Fed always overshoots, in both directions. Thus, I suspect that by the time the Fed tries to reverse course, it will be too late to stop several large entities from collapsing under the pressure (the market is not ready for this environment, and most humans do not adapt to change quickly enough to make the adjustments they will need to make to save their organizations).

SVB collapsed because it did not adapt to the changing conditions quickly enough and was caught wrong-footed on Treasuries.  Which crashed because the Fed had to hike rates quickly, which it had to do because inflation was (/is) out of control, which in turn happened because the Fed and the US Government both printed way too much free and easy money for way too long.

Remember that when these same entities who have completely mismanaged our economy try to shift the blame elsewhere by insisting that they (yes, the very same government that caused the problems!) could have stopped this (and the rest of what's coming) if only they'd had even more control/"regulation."

This is akin to an arsonist insisting that he could have saved a building that he himself lit on fire -- if only he'd been allowed to light even more fires.

So ultimately, this is yet another collapse that can be laid at the doorstep of the core Keynesian philosophy (top-down central "management" of the economy) that has long captivated and motivated the leaders of our institutions.  As the trouble snowballs, you'd better believe they will not want to take the blame for any of it -- so the history-rewrites and propaganda will start any minute, if they haven't already.  After all, if the masses ever figured out the game, voters might wake up and start demanding the government relinquish some of its control, and we can't have that.

If you can't tell, I get a bit upset when I think about what they've done to our country, and I get even more upset when they obfuscate it.  If the public continues to be misdirected into blaming the wrong things, nothing will ever get better.  It will only get worse... and unfortunately, that's the path we seem to be on.

Let's get to the charts.  Last Wednesday, I wrote:

Bear v, were it to materialize directly, only needs to break the low at 3928, but if it can sustain a breakdown there, then 3820-45 would certainly be within the range of possibility for bear v.

SPX came within a point of that target on Friday, and should reach it at the open today:

Big picture, blue 2 is, of course, still very much on the table:

NYA remains in lockstep with SPX:

In conclusion, it's finally starting to feel like the market is waking up to the realities that we've been discussing here for over a year now.  There are still options for complex second waves here (variations on Red 2 on the second chart), but for now, the trend is our friend, and we won't discuss those in more detail until the market gives us reason to.  Do keep in mind that SPX will reach its first downside target zone, so a bounce soon is not out of the question.  Trade safe.

NYA and SPX: Another Hit

Last update noted that SPX turned where it needed to, and within 8 points of its upside target -- and the bear count for the decline to make another new low was given as a "slight favorite."  That new low has since happened, so things are looking as rosy as they can for bears at this point.

Everything looks pretty good for Blue 2, but I always look for other potentials in case of error, which we'll discuss on the next two charts.  First, SPX is back to the red trend line:

Second, the black diagonal can't be entirely ruled out just yet, but it's probably a heavy underdog:

In conclusion, last update's lean toward another new low proved correct and bears have again done what they needed to.  While I can't entirely rule out all the near-term bull options just yet, they appear to be considerable underdogs.  Trade safe.