SPX Update: April Target Captured

Yesterday, SPX captured one of its "all roads lead lower" targets from April, but did so with what may have been a b-wave:

(note: black "alt: 5" should be where blue b is)

So the chart above suggests that another low is still needed, but since April's target was captured, it's a little trickier than it might otherwise be:

In conclusion, if yesterday's low was it, then it will rally strongly for a tradeable bounce from here; if the low was a b-wave, then a rally toward 3995-4015 wouldn't be unusual (though it does not need to reach that zone).  I'm leaning toward the b-wave low (meaning there will be a reversal back to retest/break the low) for now, but f SPX sustains a breakout above 4015, then the b-wave will become suspect.  Trade safe.

SPX Update

So it seems inflation is still rising (despite the headline numbers suggesting otherwise, core inflation actually rose at double the rate of March), which is absolutely shocking, given the Fed bothered to raise rates by one-millionth of one tenth of one percent.  Plus Powell and Biden have both been glancing sternly at inflation for some time, yet it seems inflation has not been cowed and has continued brazenly onward.  Is there no stopping this "inflation"?  What possible other options are there?

Sigh.  This is what happens when Keynesianism (or any other theory) becomes entrenched in our ruling class.  Eventually there are no voices left to say, "Hey, maybe we're a little off on this."  It just become an echo chamber.  I haven't even checked lately, but are we still blaming "Putin"?  Because that would be pretty funny, inasmuch as oil has since frequently traded below the price it was on the first day of Russia's invasion, and did so again this week.  (Plus, of course, inflation began its current trend well before the invasion.)

Anyway, don't get me going on all this.  Let's get right to the charts.  Blue 4 was confirmed since last update:

In a perfect world, SPX looks like it probably needs another low to be a complete wave, though (please read the entire annotation here):

If we bounce immediately, then we're probably working on the smaller-scale expanded flat that shown above, and not on the larger expanded flat we've been discussing as an option (below); at least, that would be my first instinct, due to the near-term chart appearing to need another wave down:

Bigger picture, the first downside target has been captured:

In conclusion, if SPX does not make a new low in short order, then we may be working on the smaller expanded flat 4th shown in chart two.  If it does make a new low directly, then bulls will want to be cautious if there's any acceleration, as this is a decent setup for an extended fifth.  Also, please keep in mind that if the fifth does not extend, then the fifth wave simply completes the larger wave for this leg of the decline, and that leads to a decent-sized corrective bounce.  Trade safe.

SPX Update: No Material Change

I spent the weekend working on a longer piece about Supercycle declines, but it's not ready for primetime yet, so short and sweet update today, since there's no material change from Friday.

First up, the near-term chart:

The expanded flat count,, which would continue to behave in a similar fashion to the count above at this point:

And the bigger picture, which likewise remains unchanged:

Continue to keep in mind that an extended fifth remains possible with SPX in the current position, so if there's a sustained breakdown, draw your crash channels and don't even think about covering until there's a sustained breakout above that channel (not trading advice).  Trade safe.

SPX and TLT Both Capture Their Near-term Targets

On Wednesday, the Federal Reserve announced that they're going to fight inflation as slowly as humanly possible and will limit themselves to 0.50 rate increases, with no thought of 0.75 increases even if inflation reaches 2000% and we begin stapling dollar bills together to use as notepads because they're cheaper than actual notepads.  Because the labor market is just that strong (wow, so strong!  It's almost hard to look at without protective eyewear) or something.

The market initially decided this was bullish, because, hey! only a 0.50 rate increase.  Then the market realized that nothing about this environment is bullish and gave it all back on Thursday.

Or it was just blue 4 in action.  You decide:

In other news, TLT reached its next downside target yesterday, testing the lower blue trend line before coming up off the day's lows:

An interesting scenario here might be for the stock market to continue dropping in blue 5, which could maybe give TLT a little boost to retest the broken black lines, as originally suggested on April 19.  Assuming any kind of correlation between stocks and bonds still exists over even short time horizons.

SPX does still have the option for a super complex flat, but as noted Tuesday/Wednesday on the chart below, even this option would look better with another new low:

Big picture, still no change:

In conclusion, Wednesday and Thursday performed right in line with the expectations of blue 4; soon we'll find out if bulls have it in them to make that wave more complex, or if that was all she wrote and we're straight on to 5.  Also, I feel like I should mention again that this would be a perfectly normal place for a fifth wave extension -- and if that were to happen, then later today or Monday could see a waterfall.  Trade safe.

SPX Update: Preferred Bear View Vindicated as SPX Makes New Yearly Low

Something significant happened since last update:  SPX made a new yearly low.  This is significant because, for the past few months, I've been insisting that a bear market has already begun -- and this new yearly low is as close to "confirmation" as we're going to get at this stage.

Let's look at the intermediate chart to understand why:

The first point is that this new low obviously removes any chance that 4114 was somehow "the end of the bear" (looking at you, Jim Cramer).  Second, it's now pretty unlikely that SPX can bottom immediately without at least needing to return to make lower prices later (this would be in the event that it doesn't make lower prices directly).  If it does start a larger bounce immediately (possible -- see forthcoming near-term charts), then it would, by all appearances, leave an incomplete wave at the low here and thus need to return to current levels to resolve that.

Now, even though I'm not currently publishing any intermediate or long-term alternate counts (because I'm viewing them as heavy underdogs), it's impossible to be 100% certain in this gig, so for sake of reference:  The bull option would be for the current red 3 to be red C, which would complete the decline and rally up to new highs.  At the risk of being wrong, I'll go on record here to say I think that's very unlikely (if my views on that weren't already obvious, given that I haven't published even so much as a hint of an alternate intermediate bull count in months).

I do find it interesting that, supposedly, sentiment is "as bearish as it was in 2008."  Having been a very active trader in 2008, I can say that's complete garbage.  In 2008, even bears were absolutely terrified that the entire system was on the verge of imploding.  I don't see anything approaching that level of fear right now.  To the contrary:  Plenty of people are still touting the bull case.  Plenty of people are saying things like, "Well, maybe if you were lucky enough to sell a few months ago..." (which we were, because we're just that "lucky") "then you should stay in cash, but otherwise, it's impossible to time the market and yada yada yada, so stay long and strong!"

Yep, "impossible to time the market."  That's how we saw this top coming two years away.

For the last couple months, I've likewise heard plenty of people calling a "bottom" in the bond market, but it continued falling anyway.

The fact is:  Most people are just not prepared for what's coming.  Even most who are leaning bearish are not even in the ballpark of understanding what's coming if the Supercycle has in fact topped.  Some are even speculating that the Fed will "let" it drop a little more, then step up with QE291 or whatever, and again bail the market out.  Maybe they will -- but I suspect this faith in Fed Omnipotence is finally misplaced.  Certainly I'll revisit my present assumptions if we ever need to, but from what I can see from here, the market's future looks darker than it has in a long time.

This bull, and even bear, complacency is to be expected after a ~13 year bull run, but it tells me bearish sentiment just isn't as bad as the numbers suggest.  And it is most definitely nothing like 2008/2009.  When people start assuming the Fed is completely powerless and the system is irreparably broken -- when every pundit you see on TV is sobbing uncontrollably during commercial breaks -- then it will be 2008-09 sentiment.

Anyway, let's take a look at one option for the bigger picture -- but do please take this with a grain of salt right now:

So big picture, I remain bearish.  But near-term, the market always has options, so let's take a look at those.  This chart has outlined the expanded flat since April 1, but expanded flats can tack on middle waves and run sideways much longer than is reasonable -- and they stink, because whether they will do that or not is completely unpredictable.

The next chart focuses more on the idea that ALL OF C completed last month.  This count could see things get ugly more immediately.

Everyone no doubt wants to know which of those near-term options I'm favoring, and the answer is:  Yuck.  I mean, you're asking me to predict out of multiple largely unpredictable options here... but if I had to go, say 51% to 49%, I'd probably put the 51% lean toward some iteration of the expanded flat on the first chart, just because it would be the most confusing to the market, and would give bulls more hope and give bears more fear, and because I wasn't entirely crazy about the "resolution" it reached on the upside.

So, in conclusion, the big picture remains bearish -- but if they want max confusion over the near-term, they could opt for some version of the expanded flat... however, I don't have enough confidence in that option yet (currently) to grant that the full weight of a "predication" per se.  Trade safe.

SPX Update: Target 4 Captured

Seems like a good day to let the charts do most of the talking.  First up, Target 4 was captured on Friday:

Next, the old "alternate" continues to look perfectly reasonable:

Next, this remains the preferred intermediate outcome:

Finally, BKX seems to add confidence to the preferred outlook:

In conclusion, other than Target 4 being captured, no material change, and the old alternate remains the leader.  Trade safe.

SPX Update: 7.62 mm Full Metal Jacket

Ya' know, on Wednesday, I almost announced that I would take Friday off, on account that Thursday was my wife's birthday (which meant I couldn't get to bed at the stupidly-early hour I need to here in Hawaii, in order to be awake at 2:30ish a.m.) but instead decided to pull a Full Metal Jacket and say to myself, "I can hack!"  But as fate would have it, I could not, in fact, hack, and I ended up getting off to a "late" start here, where it's currently the late-riser lazy-person hour of 3:35 a.m. -- so just two charts this morning.

The big picture is unchanged:

Near-term, SPX could have completed the dreaded fourth wave yesterday, but fourth waves are everyone's nightmare, so it can always become more complex:

I noted on Wednesday that the T3 target zone capture was also an inflection point. and we did end up getting a bounce there, but be aware if SPX manages to sustain a breakout over yesterday's high without breaking below 4188 first, then bears might want to be cautious, as there are still options (if those conditions are met) for larger complex rallies.  Trsde safe.